![]() riboflavin -> en:e101 - vegan: maybe - vegetarian: yes - percent_min: 0 - percent_max: 20.thiamin mononitrate -> en:thiamin-mononitrate - percent_min: 0 - percent_max: 25.niacin -> en:e375 - vegan: maybe - vegetarian: maybe - percent_min: 0 - percent_max: 50.Thank you!įlour ( wheat flour, niacin, reduced iron, thiamin mononitrate, riboflavin, folic acid), sugar, vegetable oil shortening ( palm and canola oil with tbhq and citric acid to protect flavor), coconut, high fructose corn syrup, contains 2% and less of ( whey ( a milk ingredient)), leavening ( ammonium bicarbonate, baking soda), salt, soy lecithin, artificial flavor, citric acid If you would like to help, join the #ingredients channel on our Slack discussion space and/or learn about ingredients analysis on our wiki. Add new entries, synonyms or translations to our multilingual lists of ingredients, ingredient processing methods, and labels.Edit this product page to correct spelling mistakes in the ingredients list, and/or to remove ingredients in other languages and sentences that are not related to the ingredients.Published by Elsevier Inc.You can help us recognize more ingredients and better analyze the list of ingredients for this product and others: Clinicians should be aware of the spectrum of reactions and diagnostic use of sIgE and SPT.Ĭopyright © 2021. ![]() ![]() 001, n = 101).Īlthough the rate of reactivity to coconut in sensitized individuals is low, half of the reactions from consumption met the criteria for anaphylaxis. Macadamia nut had the strongest correlation with coconut (r = 0.81, P <. Cosensitization with tree nuts, legumes, and seeds was common. At an SPT of 9 mm wheal or sIgE of 58 kU of allergen/L, there is a 95% probability of reaction. The probability of allergy with positive SPT result was approximately 50% and with sIgE was approximately 60%. Although not statistically significant, there was a trend toward more coconut allergy vs sensitization in Asian and African American patients. Clinical reactivity vs sensitization was more common in topical coconut users (2-fold) (P =. Approximately 50% of oral ingestion reactions were associated with mild/moderate anaphylaxis. The reactions occurred with breastfeeding (n = 2), contact (n = 10), or oral ingestion (n = 57). Of 275 records reviewed, 69 patients reported coconut reactions and 206 were sensitized only or nonallergic. Probability curves were computed by logistic regression for SPT and coconut sIgE. Methods include retrospective chart review at an urban tertiary care center of patients with positive testing result for coconut. To characterize the allergic reactions to coconut and suggest diagnostic cutoffs for specific immunoglobulin E (sIgE) and skin prick testing (SPT) to predict clinically reactive coconut allergy. Our knowledge to date is mainly based on case reports. Little is known on the clinical manifestations of coconut allergy.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |